It would seem that Chicago Cubs manager Joe Maddon had a bone to pick with Major League Baseball, and he didn't mind if Washington Nationals closer Sean Doolittle was inconvenienced in the process.
That's basically what happened on Saturday night as Doolittle started the ninth inning. After kicking and firing his first pitch, here came Maddon from the opposing dugout and made straight for the home plate umpire.
His point? That Doolittle allegedly lifts his leg to throw a pitch and then toe taps before extending his leg forward and throwing the pitch.
Why does he care? Because of earlier this season, when one of his pitchers, Carl Edwards Jr., was told he could not do what Maddon perceives to be a similar move.
After the next pitch, Maddon yells from the dugout that he will be protesting the game. So ensues another conversation with the umpire crew, as Doolittle gets understandably upset on the mound.
Maddon insists that he is formally protesting the outcome of the game, and the home plate umpire signals up to the official scorekeeper with a 'P' motion.
Back in the clubhouse, he didn't hold back in describing Maddon's move.
"In that moment, he’s not trying to do anything other than rattle me and it was kind of tired," Doolittle told reporters. "I don’t know. Sometimes he has to remind people how smart he is and how much he pays attention to the game and stuff like that. He put his stamp on it for sure."
As if to prove Doolittle's point, Maddon walked back his promise to protest the game, claiming on Sunday that he talked to the MLB league office and elected not to formally protest it, despite repeatedly interrupting the game to do so.
When asked to explain the decision, Maddon offered this:
"I really didn’t anticipate a whole lot to be done with it," Maddon said. "I still don’t agree with the conclusion because I think it’s exactly what Carl did, only a different version of it."
Yes, you read that correctly. It was exactly the same thing, but a different version of it. Then, Maddon played the protective parent card.
"But the point was, I would not be a good parent had I not spoken up for my guy, and that’s what I was doing (Saturday) night: speaking up for Carl," he said. "It’s just to eliminate any kind of gray area there for the future because it’s going to happen again somewhere. And you’re just trying to delineate what is right and what is wrong."
Trying to delineate what is right and wrong, but not committed enough to protest the game.